ACADEMIC SURVEYS

The usefulness of the CPL analysis results can be seen from the consistent increase in learning outcomes over the past three years, which shows the success of the program in implementing a performance-based evaluation system. The measurement results are used in real terms to: improve the curriculum structure and distribution of CPL in research courses, strengthen the capacity of student research methodologies, and improve the quality of graduate scientific publications. Every semester, the results of the CPL are evaluated in an academic quality review meeting. Improvement steps are carried out through improving the quality of research supervision, international scientific writing training, and strengthening  scientific soft skills (critical thinking, problem solving, and academic communication). Thus, the CPL analysis at PSDIK FMIPA Unhas has provided real benefits in improving the quality of graduates and becoming the basis for continuous improvement.

Overall, PSDIK FMIPA Unhas has succeeded in fulfilling the aspects of readability, depth, and usefulness in fulfilling the CPL. The versatility is reflected in the equitable distribution of CPL in each course, the depth can be seen from the preparation of a comprehensive RPS with the support of theoretical and practical studies, and the usefulness is shown by the increase  in Graduate Learning Outcomes (CPL) over time in the last 3 years. Improvement steps such as improving learning methods based on case studies, as well as the integration of relevant research show the commitment of study programs in maintaining and improving the quality of graduates in a sustainable manner.

The following is a survey of the results of the measurement of the learning outcomes of graduates of study programs.